O blogue que, desde novembro de 2008, lhe conta tudo o que acontece na política americana, com os olhos postos nos últimos dois anos da era Obama e na corrida às eleições presidenciais de 2016
sexta-feira, 17 de dezembro de 2010
Obama assina o acordo fiscal que prolonga as «Bush Tax Cuts»
Está confirmado o primeiro acordo bipartidário da segunda metade do mandato presidencial de Barack Obama, num claro sinal da via que o Presidente adoptou para recuperar o centro:
«Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama signed an $858 billion tax bill into law Friday, saying, "this is progress, and that's what (the American people) sent us here to achieve."
"We are here with good news for the American people this holiday season," he said. "By a wide margin, both houses of Congress passed a package of tax relief that will protect the middle class, that will grow our economy and will create jobs for the American people."
Obama was flanked on stage by both Democrats and Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who was instrumental in getting the bipartisan legislation passed. Incoming House Speaker John Boehner, however, did not attend the signing.
"Candidly speaking, there are some elements in this legislation that I don't like. There are some elements that members of my party don't like. There are some elements that Republicans here today don't like. That's the nature of compromise."
With Obama's signature, states can begin to reinstate unemployment benefits, so that people "will get them in time for Christmas," he said.
"Not only will middle class Americans avoid a tax increase, but tens of millions of Americans will start the New Year off right by opening their first paycheck to see that it's actually larger than the one they get right now.
"This is real money that's going to make a real difference in peoples' lives. I would not have signed this bill if it didn't include other extensions of relief that were set to expire."
The House of Representatives gave final approval late Thursday night to the deal, negotiated by the White House and top Senate Republicans. The final vote of 277-148 had almost equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans in support.
The package includes a two-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts, which are set to expire December 31. It also would extend unemployment benefits for 13 months, cut the payroll tax by 2 percentage points for a year, restore the estate tax at a lower level and continue a series of other tax breaks.
The bill, which cleared the Senate 81-19 on Wednesday, passed despite objections from both the left and the right. However, the pending expiration of the lower tax rates dating to 2001 created a deadline that forced both sides to accept provisions they had long opposed.
Obama and congressional Democrats yielded in their opposition to extending the lower tax rates to wealthy Americans and also agreed to a lower estate tax than had been scheduled to take effect. In return, Republicans led by McConnell agreed to extending unemployment benefits along with the payroll tax cut and other tax breaks that conservatives generally oppose as government stimulus measures.
Senate Republicans insisted on all taxpayers getting the same treatment. They used filibusters to block Democratic measures that would have limited the extended tax cuts to individuals earning less than $200,000 a year and families earning less than $250,000 a year, and then those earning less than $1 million a year.
Obama complained that the Republicans were holding the extended tax cuts for the rest of the country "hostage" by insisting that the wealthiest 2 percent of taxpayers be included rather than approving an extension of the tax cuts for low and middle-income Americans.
Democrats expressed mixed feelings before the final vote.
"This is very difficult," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California. "Nobody wants taxes to go up for the middle class. We just don't see why we have to give an extra tax cut to the wealthiest."
Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, voted against the bill. He said he had a good reason: concern about the federal debt.
"We all like less taxes, but this came at an immense cost," he said on CNN's "American Morning" on Friday. "We say it's our money. It certainly is. But it's also our debt. And now we have much more of it."
Rep. Marcia Blackburn, R-Tennessee, supported the bill.
"I think it is important we realize this is the American taxpayers' money," she said Friday morning. "Yesterday, what we did was to extend the Bush-era tax cuts. ... This is letting taxpayers keep their money. This is the money they are not going to send to Washington."
Republican Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, meanwhile, had argued that letting anyone's taxes go up would hinder economic recovery, while a return to higher tax rates for those making more than $250,000 a year would hit small-business owners who are important job creators.
A procedural snag earlier Thursday forced House Democratic leaders to pull the bill from consideration over concerns that they lacked support on how the debate would proceed under rules they had set. The House then went into indefinite recess as liberal Democrats seeking changes to the bill huddled with party leaders to work out a solution.
Eventually, debate resumed on a new set of rules that would allow the House to vote on a proposed change to the controversial estate tax provision and then on the full bill itself. The House rejected the amendment changing the estate tax rate and then easily passed the unchanged bill.
Earlier, Obama strongly praised the Senate vote and urged the House of Representatives to quickly approve the bill.
The Senate vote is "a win for American families, American businesses and our economic recovery," Obama said in a written statement. "As this bill moves to the House ... I hope that members from both parties can come together in a spirit of common purpose to protect American families and our economy as a whole by passing this essential economic package."
House Democrats, however, repeatedly warned that they would try to change the measure, particularly the estate tax provision. The estate tax was scheduled to return with an exemption on inheritances up to $1 million and tax amounts above that at a rate of 55 percent. Under the tax package, the tax rate was reduced to 35 percent on amounts above a $5 million individual exemption.
Conservatives argued that an estate tax more stringent than the level set by the package would, among other things, make it nearly impossible for many family-owned small businesses to be passed down from one generation to the next. Liberals contended that a lower or nonexistent estate tax would merely benefit the wealthy while doing little to aid the economy.
A number of House Democrats wanted to change the estate tax to levels previously approved in a separate House bill that would exempt inheritances up to $3.5 million and tax amounts above that at a 45 percent rate. Pelosi said the change would bring in an additional $23 billion and would affect only 6,600 more families than the lower rate and higher exemption in the negotiated tax deal.
However, more than two dozen moderate House Democrats submitted a letter to their House leadership calling for the tax package to be passed unchanged so it could go directly to Obama to be signed into law.
Republicans involved in the negotiations with the White House on the package warned that any changes by the House could derail the entire proposal, causing tax rates to increase in 2011.
With the Bush-era tax cuts set to expire at the end of the year, Obama and congressional Democrats faced a fast-approaching deadline to reach a deal. Republicans won control of the House and reduced the Democratic majority in the Senate in the new Congress convening in January, which would give Democrats less leverage to negotiate after the current lame-duck session.
House liberals weren't the only ones objecting to the agreement. A number of conservatives, including likely 2012 GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, were challenging the deal because it doesn't permanently extend the Bush-era tax cuts and would add to the deficit.»
in CNN.com
Subscrever:
Enviar feedback (Atom)
2 comentários:
Quanto te pagam para fazeres este blogue? E por que via recebes? Coloca isso num post.
Não costumo responder a anónimos, mas não me custa tirar a dúvida: ninguém me paga nada, como é óbvio...
Criei este blogue a 10 de Novembro de 2008, no seguimento de um trabalho de acompanhamento permanente do fenómeno Obama, desde que ele apareceu na Convenção Democrata de 2004, em Boston.
Esse «work in progress» já deu num livro, «Histórias da Casa Branca», editado em Maio passado pela Prime Books.
Espero ter respondido a dúvida do caro leitor anónimo. Agradecia que numa próxima oportunidade se identificasse.
Obrigado e continue a ler este humilde espaço...
Enviar um comentário